The Benefits and Risks of Food Steroids, Antibiotics, and Sprays in Research Paper

The Benefits and Risks of Food Steroids, Antibiotics, and Sprays in the Eye of the Food Manufacturers and the Consumers - search Paper ExampleDiseases that can be acquired from eating processed intellectual nourishments with nutrient steroids, antibiotics, and sprays. 1. Cancer 2. Diabetes 3. Heart Diseases B. The wont use of antibiotics was a contributing factor in the surge of drug-resistant bacteria. C. Research of different scientists showing the risks of employ aliment steroids, antibiotics, and sprays to humans. IV. The role of the government in the use of food steroids, antibiotics, and food sprays by food manufacturers. A. The research done by the National Research Council as commissioned by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the aggregate for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) under the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). B. The regulations and guidelines issued by the government 1. The Animal medicative Drug Use Clarification Act 2. The Animal Drug Availability Act C. T he recommendations of the government for the food manufacturing industry for the safety and health of consumers. I. Introduction Additives such as antibiotics, steroids and other sprays were created for food for a reason. Providing food quickly and cheaply to a rapidly expanding population was not an easy task for the food industry over the past century. The short shelf life of most products made storage hailly, and adverse defy conditions, animal sickness, and other environmental challenges maintained a high risk of losses to the industry. A bureau out for combating these challenges was offered by scientific developments the use of pesticides to kill pests that destroy farms, antibiotics to ensure the health of livestock, and steroids to make the livestock reproduce fast enough to meet the growing demand for meat. These interventions made food more affordable, accessible, and helped knock down losses (National Research Council). However, they also brought a new series of cha llenges to the table. As scientific knowledge grew, so did the concern about possible ways that additives in food could harm the people consuming them. In particular, were concerns of how the chemical effects on food may promote obesity and lead to heart disease. agrarian chemicals, pesticides, and veterinary drugs are now included among the most significant chemical hazards in food (Lawley, Curtis and Davis, 4). This authorship will discuss the benefits, potential harmful effects, and governmental policies regarding the use of food steroids, antibiotics, and sprays in food manufacturing. It shall also discuss how the government can help resolve the conflict between health advocates and the food industry. The dissertation for this paper is as follows. The government should implement strict guidelines on the use of food steroids, antibiotics, and sprays in the output process instead of banning their use in order to balance the claims of the food manufacturers as rise up as the adv ocates of public health of the benefits and risks of these food enhancers. II. The benefits derived by food manufactured in using food steroids, antibiotics, and sprays. D. Production cost is low. Mathhew Perrone has reported that early studies on antibiotics in the 1940s and 1950s showed that adding antibiotics to animals diet cut back their feeding costs, and made them ready for consumption faster. Feeding takes up about 70 percent of the cost of raising animals, and the use of antibiotics was thus a windfall for farmers. This led the FDA to approve the use of antibiotics for farm animals in the 1950s. No harmful effects of this policy were known until then. Since the